- Your research paper is written by certified writers
- Your requirements and targets are always met
- You are able to control the progress of your writing assignment
- You get a chance to become an excellent student!
Essay Details:
Essay text:
During a reduction in force by the defendant in 2003, the plaintiff was terminated. In January of 2004, the plaintiff filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and received her Notice of Right to Sue on January 30, 2004. The plaintiff filed suit on February 13, 2004 alleging that she was discriminated and retaliated against by the defendant as a result of her age and gender. AEFA moved for a summary judgment.
LAWS BEING APPLIED:
The plaintiff is arguing claims of:
• Age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
• Gender discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
• Gender and age discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act
ISSUES FACING THE COURT:
• Was the plaintiff discriminated against on the basis of her age?
• Was the plaintiff discriminated against on the basis of her gender?
• Was the plaintiff retaliated against as a result of pursuing legal action?
RESOLUTION:
The court granted AEFA’s motion for a summary judgment for several reasons...
Showed 18% of text Buy database access to get full access to all 184 988 essays
Calculate a fair price for your order
Do you need an essay?
A professional team of writers is able to craft custom essays from scratch according to your instructions. We are ready to satisfy writing needs of every demanding customer.
Do you need many essays?
The product provided is intended to be used for research or study purposes. Get instant access to over 200,000 papers.
Common topics in this essay:
- court case
- Business Law court case
- Case of GAIL India: Increasing creativity and innovation of employees
- Synopsis of Barry Winston Court Case
- supreme court desicion of hypothetical case
- Analysis Of Walter Lee Younger - A Raisin In The Sun
- My Younger Years
- Work Life: Productivity And Retention In Male Employees
- Discrepancy Principle In The Workplace
- Case Analysis: Wittenburg v. AMEX
- Court Case Number 15: Bowers V. Hardwick (june 30, 1986)
- Court Case
- Court Case: New York Times vs. US
- Supreme Court Case Miller v. California
- Microsoft Court Case
Feedback of people who used our services.
Similar Essays:
4 pages / 1107 words |
|||
2 pages / 524 words |
|||
2 pages / 529 words |
|||
3 pages / 776 words |
|||
1 pages / 153 words |
|||
2 pages / 453 words |
|||
2 pages / 550 words |